Would you say that to experience is "spectre" or one of the mentioned women in your article? To experience something is always to step into darkness or ignorance; even if "the thing" is known and the subject's action has been repeated a hundred times there is always a recall or at the very least a clarification of something forgotten or vague. And the female as the frame or the question that the male enters with an act or a reply fits with experience being either female in the sense of something unknown stepped into or/and the fruit or child of this male act (maybe emotion is this child, but the fear or excitement before the act and emotion during and after the act is not the experience itself)
If Father loves (and we don't "get lost inside spectre" where love is a nice idea or principle) then that demands a woman or darkness that were always there, an experience that generates love. And before always, before time...experience is the beginning of time.
But if Love is God (the Father) then...it gets complicated. As above, so below, but "in heaven" many things are inverted to how it is here in the world: Loving, which is God the Father, by His essense emanates His principle energies: experience and His image the Son.
I’d say that specter is fundamentally *not* experience; it is to only imagine spooks within one’s own headspace, divorced from the Real. The final woman who is specter would be the Whore of Babylon, certainly not Zoe.
Ah so your specter is more a mental thing, like e.g. ensnaring oneself in rationality, than something metaphysical that has one of it’s expressions there? What is the darkness that Zoe goes into here then, which the light is mixed up with?
Specter to me is more of a *place*, a zone of nothingness where our psyches can get lost. I lay it all out in my other posts, including the first one in the series:
My memory became spectre after all these weeks. "we mustn’t abstract away from flesh and project ourselves into the wastelands of specter" is a good line showing it's not any unknowing that one may experience. And I got at the conclusion that we become spectre, out there in the abyss that doesn't exist. Sort of opposite to what you comment now hehe. Well then, so the darkness where Zoe goes where is that then? I have to read this article for a third time.
(I am setting up my own metaphysics/antropology for my own enchantment and to remove givens that doesn't actually make any sense, and I don't have time to read hundreds of books so I pick up on others to direct myself to more knowledge. I have no desire to get into my fifties, or eigthties, because I must read all that has been written before I can stand on my very own feet and look with my own eyes)
Would you say that to experience is "spectre" or one of the mentioned women in your article? To experience something is always to step into darkness or ignorance; even if "the thing" is known and the subject's action has been repeated a hundred times there is always a recall or at the very least a clarification of something forgotten or vague. And the female as the frame or the question that the male enters with an act or a reply fits with experience being either female in the sense of something unknown stepped into or/and the fruit or child of this male act (maybe emotion is this child, but the fear or excitement before the act and emotion during and after the act is not the experience itself)
If Father loves (and we don't "get lost inside spectre" where love is a nice idea or principle) then that demands a woman or darkness that were always there, an experience that generates love. And before always, before time...experience is the beginning of time.
But if Love is God (the Father) then...it gets complicated. As above, so below, but "in heaven" many things are inverted to how it is here in the world: Loving, which is God the Father, by His essense emanates His principle energies: experience and His image the Son.
I’d say that specter is fundamentally *not* experience; it is to only imagine spooks within one’s own headspace, divorced from the Real. The final woman who is specter would be the Whore of Babylon, certainly not Zoe.
Ah so your specter is more a mental thing, like e.g. ensnaring oneself in rationality, than something metaphysical that has one of it’s expressions there? What is the darkness that Zoe goes into here then, which the light is mixed up with?
Specter to me is more of a *place*, a zone of nothingness where our psyches can get lost. I lay it all out in my other posts, including the first one in the series:
https://beulahrising.substack.com/p/presence-versus-specter
https://beulahrising.substack.com/p/spell-of-the-spectacle
My memory became spectre after all these weeks. "we mustn’t abstract away from flesh and project ourselves into the wastelands of specter" is a good line showing it's not any unknowing that one may experience. And I got at the conclusion that we become spectre, out there in the abyss that doesn't exist. Sort of opposite to what you comment now hehe. Well then, so the darkness where Zoe goes where is that then? I have to read this article for a third time.
(I am setting up my own metaphysics/antropology for my own enchantment and to remove givens that doesn't actually make any sense, and I don't have time to read hundreds of books so I pick up on others to direct myself to more knowledge. I have no desire to get into my fifties, or eigthties, because I must read all that has been written before I can stand on my very own feet and look with my own eyes)