Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Naida's avatar

"Ḥāfiẓ refers several times to the angels’ inability to understand love and the relationship between man and God. God invites the angels to the spectacle of creation to admire mankind, but when they hear that God is planning to appoint man as a vicegerent on earth (2:30), the angels wonder whether man is going to misuse his power and cause damage. Iblīs, or Satan, started an argument with God, disobeying His command to prostrate himself before mankind. Although ultimately Iblīs was the only angel who disobeyed God’s command, Ḥāfiẓ states that angels generally do not know love: 'O cup-bearer, angels do not know what love is. Ask for a beaker and pour rosewater on Adam’s clay'.

& 'When Your countenance was revealed, it saw that angels had no love, Its honour offended, it became all fire, and struck Adam’s soul. O angel, give praise at the door of love’s wine-house For inside, they are leavening the clay of mankind.'

Using the imperative ‘praise’ in addressing the angels, Ḥāfiẓ highlights the special loving relationship between man and his Creator. Man’s nature is prepared in the wine-house of love to which angels have no access; they should stay outside the door, simply praising God.

We have already seen how Iblīs refused to prostrate himself before Adam. As a lover of God, who had devotedly worshipped Him, Iblīs became jealous when he witnessed the loving relationship between God and mankind. The story of his disobedience as told by the mystics is complicated by the element that, when the angels bowed before Adam, they saw the image of God in him, thus avoiding the idolatry which Iblīs had said would occur. In one of his couplets, Ḥāfiẓ states: When the angels bowed before Adam, their intention was to kiss the ground before you."

- Hafiz and the Religion of Love in Classical Persian Poetry, Leonard Lewisohn

Kalle Kula's avatar

Hmm, what about angels as messengers and not a "species"? As when magical spells in fairys' tails are cast and often bring unforeseen things, it would seem like nothing new is really called up by a spell but rather a moment from outside the poetic veil is brought into the now, a moment which already is populated and surrounded by wills and lives that aren't glimpsed by the unpoetic mind. The prophets are in a sense angels when they are being sent by God, these beings leading an existence of tones and shades of emotions and colours in the shades, couldn't they be sent by God as well, and that would be when a "real angel" is going forth?

I am not trying to be poetic, I just can't express it in a normal rational way. But angels longing for human experience feels off somehow. We are supposedly three dimensional beings, but like Ouspensky shows, we are really multi dimensional, it's just our self imposed limited ways of perceiving that locks us in x, y and z. If other creations' "x, y, z" are not based on your clay circle, they might have their own equivalent to our bodies, and "demonic" as below even the beastialic in St Paul's words would thus make sense for a being e.g. made of tones (as a bad example] giving in to spectral ideas of sexual intercourse in the flesh.

20 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?